Hard as nails...

Posted in Rated or Slated by Matt Ward on Tue 08 Feb '11

© www.mudsweatandtears.co.uk

When I was sent the blurb by the lovely Rowena at UK Gear on the new PT-1000 shoe, it seemed too good to be true. The implication was that the shoes will last 1000 miles and hardly be worn…

All British Army recruits get issued with a pair of standard UK Gear shoes every year – or used to, as the PT-1000 will now be issues all 450 instructors at the Army Physical Training Corp’s (APTC) Aldershot base.

If Andrew Murray is anything to go by too, these Army-ready shoes will go well beyond this. Personally, I am not a great believer in the ’500 mile rule’ (i.e replace them as they are no longer up to the job and you will get injured if you dont go out and buy some nice new ones) that so readily gets bandied about by some shoe brands.

How can a shoe used by a 15 stone pronator, running on tarmac, wear and degrade at the same rate as the same shoe worn by a pretty neutral striking 10-stoner in that same distance and time-frame? Equally, before run and after run care of the shoe can affect the EVA and so on, and so on. Anyway…how did they fair when we tested them over about 150 miles in total over the last three months?

Wear: After running in these on a variety of surfaces and gradients, the outsole appears to have minimal wear. Pretty damn impressive. In fact it would be interesting to understand the rubber compounds that UK Gear have used in the rear and mid-foot areas, as I can honestly not see any significant wear in these areas.

© www.mudsweatandtears.co.uk


© www.mudsweatandtears.co.uk


Build: As the box says ‘Built to Survive’. I am astounded by the the build quality actually. For free movement and unrestricted feeling the PT-1000 doesn’t score highly in my book. For quality and peace of mind that these babies wont collapse at the first sign of off-road conditions, they are up there. If anything, they feel over engineered – like a great 80’s Volkswagen that was built to never give up or be overtaken by the ravages of the terrain it inhabits.

© www.mudsweatandtears.co.uk

Ride: For me, too harsh. I am a lightweight guy, who likes to be able to feel the terrain beneath his feet. With the PT-1000’s you don’t get that. But, not all are like mois, and you certainly feel that you have something considerable on your foot whilst on the move. And I can see that some of the bigger guys and girls out there would like that feel of a sturdy shoe.

© www.mudsweatandtears.co.uk

On road: Very positive, good support, reasonably light (for what is a trainer after all). Nothing to get too excited about, but solid.

Off-road: Surprisingly good (I say this as the shoe is aimed at the trails as well as the road, and the tread didn’t exactly inspire confidence when I first saw it). That is on the low-level trails and canal path terrain. Unfortunately anything very wet and of a gradient above about 20% and the PT 1000 struggles. Not exactly tank-like put it that way.

VFM: 9 /10, really, as if these were the shoes for you they will last and last and probably be a great all-rounder for your ‘everyday’ needs.

Would I buy them: Me, personally, no. But I am no yardstick. I live in the high forests of Wales and most of my running is on trails, tracks and hills that are severe in gradient and often wet and muddy. If I was an everyday runner, living in a UK environment that wasn’t too harsh, and was doing lots of tarmac miles, with the need for lots of support – yes.

Rated or slated: Definitely rated. This isn’t about if they work for me, but if they work, and when it comes to doing what it says on the tin (or box) these shoes deliver – and that is what it is all about.

© www.mudsweatandtears.co.uk

SRP: £95

Reactions so far
  1. Paul Bateson Feb 10, 10:02 AM

    I can certainly vouch for this shoes wear proof claims. After around 1100km still very little wear and even better the uppers are un-marked (just a bit grubby). As I only weigh 62kg I did think they may be a bit ‘clumpy’ but they are deceptively light. Not the best shoe for technical trails but we have loads of olive grove and 4×4 tracks which are rough but not too bad. On road they are fine and I just ran a 40:37 10km in them (bear in mind I am 60). As Matt says, I am also not a believer in changing shoes after 500miles and these will definately make the 1000mile point. (Don’t get confused by the before and after pics, the support model has grey forefoot and the neutral red). Most of the pics are of the neutral one.

Comments closed

Report an offensive post

Latest comments

  • Adair Broughton 03 Jun '14(Andi and Katie are Great in Keswick)

    Fantastic event to watch and …

  • Don 03 May '14(Bragg settles for a podium place at the Fellsman)

    Didn’t the leading 2 have …

  • Peter Mackie 24 Apr '14(3 Peaks - the joy of winning)

    The closest I’ll get to …

About MST

Mud, Sweat and Tears was dreamt up some time ago. I had returned to the sport of running (competitively) after around a 15 year layoff due to injury.

Read more…

Alex Vero
Great story. Great film making...
Athletics Weekly
The don dada of running magazines
Fell photos
These shots are top notch emotion
The FRA's site, still strong...
The all-seeing eye
The very best coverage for all things ultra-trail, and much more!
Jonathan Wyatt
The greatest hill runner of our time...
New and eeeven better!
Original Mountain Marathon
Does what its says on the tin
Run Snowdonia
Iain and Sarah Ridgway's excellent mountain running guide service!
Runner's World
The mag for the masses
Running over Mountains and around the World
International blog from Moira O'Sullivan
Dont sleep on this one!
Trail Running
Great trail running resource, take a peek
Trail Running Magazine
UK magazine devoted to the exciting, adventurous world of off-road running!
UK Athletics
Track and field, and other stuff
Welsh Fell Runners Association
World Mountain Running Association
IAAF's global up hill, down dale, site
Friends & Family
  • After Market logo
  • Block Interactive logo
More Videos

Check out the MST collection: